Skip to main content

Zia ul-Haq's Rule in Pakistan

The history of Pakistan has witnessed various moments of turmoil and challenges, but perhaps one of its darkest periods unfolded during the reign of General Zia ul Haq. From 1977 to 1988, Zia ul-Haq's military dictatorship brought about significant destruction, leaving a lasting impact on the social, political, and economic fabric of Pakistan. This essay delves into the destructive consequences of Zia ul Haq's regime and its reverberations on the nation.

The tenure of Zia ul Haq as the President of Pakistan from 1978 to 1988 left a lasting impact on the country. While opinions on his rule vary, it is widely recognized that his policies and actions significantly affected Pakistan's political, social, and economic landscape. This man claimed to be the reviver of Islamic values. But, he was running the government through interest, which is one of the deadliest sins in Islam. This blog post explores the impact and controversies surrounding Zia ul-Haq's rule, shedding light on the complexities and nuances of his legacy.

Political Repression and Authoritarianism

Zia ul Haq seized power through a military coup, overthrowing the democratically elected government of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Under the guise of Islamization, Zia curtailed civil liberties, suppressed political dissent, and stifled democratic institutions. He imposed draconian laws, such as his version of Hudood Ordinances, which disproportionately affected women, religious minorities (especially Shia Muslims), and marginalized groups. The curbs on freedom of speech and association led to the marginalization of political opposition, weakening the foundations of the country and breeding a culture of fear. It was during his time when the public flogging of the journalists who opposed him, as the 'Islamic penalty' occurred. However, during the Rashidun Caliphate, the people could question and disagree with the caliph on their opinions. That was the freedom of expression, that Islam gave. Unlike the so-called Islamization" of this man. 

One of the key criticisms of Zia ul-Haq's regime was its suppression of political dissent and curtailment of civil liberties. Opposition parties, activists, and intellectuals faced arrests, imprisonment, and restrictions on their activities. The government tightened control over the judiciary and media, limiting their independence and hindering the functioning of institutions. This repression stifled political pluralism and weakened the fabric of the country.

According to an estimate, over 20, 000 people were imprisoned during his regime. The Human rights organizations claimed that the prisoners were suffered from electric shocks, undressed, and also beaten up through tied up from the ice-blocks. Which seems that, this man was even more brutal than Hitler.

So-called Islamization and its Consequences

Zia ul-Haq's policy of Islamization aimed to establish a more conservative and religiously oriented society. While the intent may have been to strengthen national identity and social cohesion, it had divisive consequences, instead of bringing the true Islamic law which has justice and protection of Human rights. He established a suppressive government in the name of Islam (the "so-called Islamic regime"). Many victims of rape, who came to the court for demanding justice, were lashed and imprisoned, for not having the four witnesses for that. Actually, that criminal penalty is only for accusers of extra-marital consensual sex. Islam wants to protect the dignity of those who are not adulterers by nature. But, still cannot de-criminalize this completely. Because of the harm to societies, that the normalization of this sin causes. For rape, It does not need to have four witnesses for the crime, and Islamic law has the most brutal and deserving punishments for the rapists. However, this "so-called Islamic regime" lashed the rape victims for this. For this reason, many uncivilized Pakistanis don't differentiate between consensual fornication and rape till now, which destroys the lives of the victims. These Pakistanis ignorantly blame the rape victims, for suffering from this unfortunate event.

The introduction of laws and amendments, such as the Hudood Ordinance, impacted women's rights and marginalized religious minorities. Critics argue that this led to the erosion of Pakistan's foundations and the exacerbation of sectarian tensions. The day when his so-called Islamic regime started was the blackest day in the history of the country. Despite his claim of establishing the Islamic values in the country, it was during his time that, the drugs were smuggled into the world.

Sectarian Divide

While projecting himself as an advocate of Islamic values, Zia ul Haq's Islamization policies not only polarized the society but also sowed the seeds of sectarian strife that continue to plague Pakistan to this day. His government introduced discriminatory laws, such as the blasphemy laws, which have been misused to target religious minorities and dissenting voices. The state-sponsored promotion of a narrow interpretation of Islam further deepened divisions within society, exacerbating sectarian tensions and nurturing extremist ideologies.

Support for Afghan Militancy

Zia ul-Haq's regime provided support to the Afghan Militancy in their fight against the Soviet Union during the Afghan War. While this support was seen as a strategic move, it had unintended consequences. The influx of foreign fighters and the rise of militant groups within Pakistan created a breeding ground for extremism and militancy. This, in turn, contributed to the destabilization of the country and ongoing violence. An estimate tells that the indulgence of Zia-ul-Haq in the Afghan war, killed 60-80 thousand Pakistanis.

Economic Impact and Burden

The large-scale Afghan immigration had a profound impact on Pakistan's economy. The sudden increase in population put immense pressure on already limited resources and strained the country's infrastructure. The healthcare and education systems struggled to accommodate the needs of both locals and refugees, while the job market became overcrowded, leading to increased competition and a decline in wages. The informal economy also faced challenges, as Afghan immigrants competed for low-skilled jobs, further exacerbating unemployment rates among Pakistani citizens.

Economic Policies and Social Welfare

Zia ul-Haq's government implemented economic reforms aimed at liberalization and deregulation. These policies attracted foreign investment and stimulated economic growth. However, critics argue that the resulting increase in income inequality and the neglect of social welfare programs led to the marginalization of vulnerable sections of society. The focus on economic growth often came at the expense of addressing social inequities, leaving many Pakistanis behind.

Nuclear Program and Regional Dynamics

During Zia ul-Haq's rule, Pakistan's nuclear program advanced significantly. The decision to conduct nuclear weapon tests in 1998 solidified Pakistan's status as a nuclear power. While the nuclear program is often regarded as a point of national pride and a symbol of deterrence, it also raised concerns about regional stability and the arms race with India. The consequences of this nuclear development continue to shape Pakistan's foreign policy and security dynamics.

Conclusion

Zia ul-Haq's rule in Pakistan left a complex and contested legacy. While some argue that his policies helped strengthen national security and economic development, others point to the erosion of the values, the rise of militancy, and the exacerbation of sectarian tensions. The impact of his rule continues to reverberate through Pakistan's political, social, and economic fabric. It is crucial to critically examine this period of history to understand the challenges and opportunities it presents for the country's future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Effects of Extreme Gender Segregation in Pakistani society

In Pakistan, severe gender segregation prevails in many areas and among many people, where women are often viewed not as individuals but as objects to be concealed from men. The popularized belief is that any close interaction between men and women could lead to indecency and immorality. While gender segregation, to some extent, is necessary to ensure privacy and comfort and guard against immorality, the enforcement of extreme segregation in Pakistan goes beyond what is essential. Islam provides guidelines for interactions between men and women, as mentioned in Surah An-Nur (verses 30-31) of the Holy Quran, to prevent indecency and uphold the sanctity of the family among Muslims. However, in Pakistan, the enforcement of gender segregation is so strict that even a respectful handshake or sitting together in a gathering between a man and a woman is considered taboo, unlike in Indonesia where such interactions are not prohibited, even though Indonesia, is also a Muslim society where the r...

Responding to Critiques of the role of Urdu as a Cultural Identity of Pakistan

In the circle of linguistic discussions and the political dispute of India and Pakistan, a common critique voiced by many Indian nationalists towards Pakistan is that Urdu essentially belongs to India, which Pakistan has adopted as its national language. But is this assertion accurate? Undoubtedly, it holds true that Urdu originated in northern India, specifically in and around Delhi, during the Delhi Sultanate. At that time, Muslims chose Persian as their official language in India, while the local Hindu populace in northern India spoke languages like Khariboli, Braj Bhasha, Awadhi, and others. As Persian loanwords and vocabulary seeped into these languages, a new language emerged, which we now refer to as Urdu. However, this is merely a historical perspective. When the British colonial rule took hold in India, a significant event occurred known as the Urdu-Hindi controversy (1867). This event played a crucial role in the establishment of Pakistan. At that time, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan al...